Privacy in an Information Society: issues from the Facebook experience
In todays society where the currency is information, and national policies are being framed to further this paradigm...privacy has indeed been sacrificed to embrace the potential of the Internet and by extension, the Information Society.
Want to know more about this topic? Contact Suella Hansen
Due to the unflattering coverage that is being given to its users disenchantment, it is likely that Facebook will soon amend its systems to more expediently permit the complete removal of accounts and user contents. Yet this situation underscores a number of broader privacy issues associated with the Internet, which have already been subject to extensive debate, but which do not appear to have been substantively resolved. These include:
- the false sense of security that the Internet can engender
- the value of information
- the possible impact of the Information Society on personal privacy
False sense of security of the Internet
In its present incarnation, the Internet is a global network of networks, which as at December 2007, had approximately 1.3 billion users worldwide. It comprises millions of smaller networks, which carry diverse applications and services, as well as considerable volumes of data. Through this connectedness, distinct benefits are realised: information can be inexpensively accessed from almost any source on the network, and it is possible to interact with people and organisations, regardless of number and independent of geographic locations.
Exhibit 1: Growth in global Internet users
from 1997 to 2006 [Source: ITU]
It is perhaps these overriding features, in the fast and increasingly impersonal pace of our societies, that have precipitated the Internets popularity as a preferred medium to connect to others, where we readily broadcast private and personal information, without fully appreciating the real threats that exist on the flipside of those benefits. As a public network that is permanently connected, but which can foster anonymity, there is continued opportunity for breach, evidenced by:
- the proliferation of and destruction by computer viruses, worms, malware programs, Trojan horses, spyware, etc
- the successful hacking of seemingly secure servers worldwide, despite the efforts made to protect those systems
- the upsurge of instances of fraud and identity theft, which are being facilitated by the Internet.
Additionally, it is a well-known fact that a persons actions online can be tracked. Through the widespread availability of personal information on the Internet, especially that willingly published by the owners, it is no longer a specialised activity to obtain some insight into someones life. For example, it was recently reported in the Nation that many employers research job applicants through Facebook and search engines, and that the police are accessing social networking sites when conducting criminal investigations.
Value of information
One of the greatest challenges of doing business on the Internet has been to translate the popularity of a website into revenue. Even for businesses that engage in the sale of goods and services over the Internet, important sources of revenue are through advertising arrangements and the sale of data generated by site visitors.
Moreover, it has been reported that even state governments in the United States have begun to exploit the value of personal information, by selling certain public records. The potential value of such material was clearly highlighted when two computer disks containing personal details on approximately 25 million people went missing in the UK last year, and it was alleged that the value of that data to criminals could be in the region of GBP1.5 billion (USD 3 billion).
The Information Society and privacy
Inherent to the value of information on the Internet, is its larger context: the Information Society. The term has become a popular catchphrase that speaks to the creation and harnessing of information as a significant driver of economic, political, and cultural activity, and its realisation has been stated as a critical goal by several countries worldwide.
The capability of society to maintain pertinent information on its citizens could be an important mechanism to better enable the social and welfare needs of each member to be addressed. However, as all aspects of life becomes digitised, the data harvested and stored will become even more invasive. Already evidenced by the wealth of information available through the Internet, no longer will this data be limited to key milestones (birth, health, education, marriage, work, etc), but even mundane and intimate activities of everyday life are already becoming part of an individuals record, which will be available to others, and could be manipulated and used by them, unbeknownst to the individual.
A frequently used quote attributed to Scott McNealy, Chairman of Sun Microsystems, is that with regard to the Internet, You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it. In todays society where the currency is information, and national policies are being framed to further this paradigm, this saying appears to be true: privacy has indeed been sacrificed to embrace the potential of the Internet and by extension, the Information Society. On the other hand, the creation of new and improved products and services, customised and better suited to our needs, is dependent, to a great extent, on developers having access to pertinent information on the public at large.
Interestingly, although the recent complaints by Facebook users are often referred to as an invasion of privacy, when the issues are examined more closely, the common point of contention appears to be the users loss of control of their content, rather than there being a breach of privacy. Hence, bearing in mind that to somehow hinder the development of the Information Society to avoid such experiences might not be possible, greater consideration may need to be given to issues related to the control of data: for example, who truly has rights to the data and for what purpose. For user-generated material, intellectual property and other proprietary rights to the owner would likely be applicable. However, for data recorded on a person, such as through a transaction or under some form of surveillance, the rights of the subject under such circumstances might not be as clear cut.
Copyright © 2008 Network Strategies Limited